Case Reports

Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma Mimicking Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Comment

Etiology
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma was originally named angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy with dysproteinemia. It was initially thought to be a benign hyperreactive immune process driven by B cells, and patients often died of infectious complications not long after the diagnosis was made.13 As more cases were reported with clonal rearrangements and signs of progressive lymphoma, AITL was recognized as a malignancy.

Presentation
Patients with AITL often present with advanced stage III or IV disease with extranodal and bone marrow involvement.3-6 Cutaneous disease occurs in up to half of patients and portends a poor prognosis.7 The rash often is a nonspecific erythematous macular and papular eruption mimicking a morbilliform viral exanthem or drug reaction. Urticarial, nodular, petechial, purpuric, eczematous, erythrodermic, and vesiculobullous presentations have been described.4,11,12 In up to one-third of cases, the eruption occurs in association with a new medication, often leading to an initial misdiagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reaction.4,11 In a review conducted by Balaraman et al,14 84% of patients with AITL reported having pruritus.

There is an association of autoimmune phenomena in patients with AITL, which is likely a result of immune dysregulation associated with poorly functioning follicular helper T cells. Patients may present with arthralgia, hemolytic anemia, or thrombocytopenic purpura. Hypergammaglobulinemia has been reported in 30% to 50% of AITL patients.4,6 Other pertinent immunologic findings include positive Coombs test, cold agglutinins, cryoglobulinemia, hypocomplementemia, and positive antinuclear antibodies.4-7

Gene Analysis
Affected lymph nodes have a characteristically effaced architecture with proliferative arborizing venules; a hyperplastic population of follicular dendritic cells; and a mixed inflammatory infiltrate that is comprised of atypical lymphocytes and variable numbers of reactive lymphocytes, histiocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells. The malignant T lymphocytes often account for only a small portion of the infiltrate.8 T-cell gene rearrangement studies identify clonal cells with β and γ rearrangements in the majority of cases.4 These cells are predominantly CD4+CD8 and express normal follicular helper T-cell markers CD10, CXCL13, BCL-6,5,9 and PD-1.10 Numerous B cells are seen intermixed with follicular dendritic cells. They are frequently infected with EBV and can have an atypical Reed-Sternberg cell–like appearance.4,5,15 In the evaluation of AITL, polymerase chain reaction studies with primers for immunoglobulin heavy and light chain should be performed to look for clonal B-cell populations and rule out a possible secondary B-cell lymphoma.

Histology
Five histologic patterns have been described with cutaneous AITL: (1) superficial perivascular infiltrate of eosinophils and lymphocytes that lack atypia, (2) sparse perivascular infiltrate with atypical lymphocytes, (3) dense dermal infiltrate of pleomorphic lymphocytes, (4) leukocytoclastic vasculitis without atypical lymphocytes,11 and (5) necrotizing vasculitis.12 The finding of vascular hyperplasia, perivascular infiltrate, or vasculitis has been reported in 91% of cases in the literature. Although these findings are nonspecific, an analysis of cutaneous cases reported in the literature found that 87% demonstrated T-cell receptor gene rearrangements.14 Lymphoid cells are positive for CD10 and PD-1, as was demonstrated in our case, and are CXCL13 positive in the majority of cases.12 Atypical and EBV-infected B cells also can be found in the skin.11,12

Differential Diagnosis
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma can mimic infectious, autoimmune, or allergic etiologies, and misdiagnosis of another type of lymphoma is not uncommon, as occurred in our case. Patients who have a delay in the correct diagnosis have similar outcomes to those correctly diagnosed at first presentation.4

Treatment
There are no effective therapies for AITL. Poor prognostic factors include age (>60 years), stages III to IV disease, male gender, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level,3,5,10 and cutaneous involvement.7 Corticosteroids, anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and autologous stem cell transplant are currently the mainstays of therapy. Initial response to chemotherapy is promising, but duration of response is poor overall and there is no increased survival.5,15 A large population-based study of 1207 cases by Xu and Liu3 showed the overall survival rate at 2 and 10 years was 46.8% and 21.9%, respectively. Ten-year disease-specific survival was 35.9%, and there was no demonstrable improvement in survival over the last 2 decades.3 Case reports have demonstrated that thalidomide,16 lenalidomide,17 and cyclosporine plus dexamethasone18 have been successfully used to achieve remission for up to 3 years.

Conclusion

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma is difficult to diagnose due to nonspecific clinical and histologic findings. Cutaneous manifestations are seen in AITL in up to half of cases that may occur early or in advanced disease. Similar to all cutaneous metastases, the appearance of the lesions can greatly vary. Our case demonstrates that dermatologists and dermatopathologists can make this diagnosis in the appropriate clinicopathologic context utilizing appropriate immunohistochemical staining and gene rearrangement studies.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation (AAMDSIF)
MDedge Dermatology
CurePSP
MDedge Dermatology
Cure SMA
MDedge Dermatology
Ehlers-Danlos Society
MDedge Dermatology
International Pemphigus and Pemphigoid Foundation
MDedge Dermatology
MDS Foundation
MDedge Dermatology
Morgan Leary Vaughan Foundation
MDedge Dermatology
Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation (OIF)
MDedge Dermatology
Make The Diagnosis - September 2018
MDedge Dermatology
Bertilimumab granted orphan drug status for bullous pemphigoid
MDedge Dermatology