Original Research

Imiquimod Cream 2.5% and 3.75% Applied Once Daily to Treat 
External Genital Warts in Men

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Secondary end points were 75% or more and 50% or more reduction in EGW count, change in EGW count from baseline, and 12-week sustained clearance rate.

Safety

Safety assessments of AEs, both volunteered and elicited, were made throughout the study.

Study Oversight

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles specified in the Declaration of Helsinki and in compliance with the requirements of local regulatory committees. All participants provided written informed consent.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis for intention-to-treat (ITT) imputations was made for missing data points using last observation carried forward (LOCF). Complete clearance rates and partial clearance rates were analyzed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics stratified by center and by gender for the overall population analyses. The percentage change in EGW count was analyzed using analysis of covariance. 
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.1.3).

Results

Study Population

Study characteristics by treatment group are summarized in the Table. Overall, 447 male participants (225 from study 1 and 222 from study 2) were included in the study. The majority of participants (84.1%) had EGWs on the penile shaft with only 1 affected region in just over half of participants (51.9%). Most participants (70.2%) were 35 years or younger, and approximately half had a baseline EGW count of 7 or less (50.6%). More than 20% of participants had an affected wart surface area greater than 150 mm2 at baseline, and in more than 60% of participants, the duration from first diagnosis of EGWs to enrollment in the study was more than 1 year.

Primary Efficacy End Point

Imiquimod cream 3.75% was statistically superior to placebo in study 1 and 
study 2 (P=.015 and P=.019, respectively)(Figure) in providing complete clearance of all EGWs (baseline or new) at EOS. Imiquimod cream 2.5% was only statistically superior to placebo in study 2 (P=.034). Importantly, there were a number of participants who did not achieve complete clearance at EOT who continued to improve posttreatment. The percentage of participants treated with imiquimod cream 3.75% and 2.5% who were completely cleared at EOT was 12.0% (14.7% study 1 and 9.1% study 2) and 7.1% 
(7.2% study 1 and 7.1% study 2), respectively, compared to complete clearance rates of 18.6% (20.0% study 1 
and 17.0% study 2) and 14.3% (13.3% study 1 and 
15.3% study 2), respectively, at EOS (ITT population).

Complete clearance rates (defined as the proportion of participants by the end-of-study [EOS] visit with zero external genital warts in all anogenital anatomic areas) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (last observation carried forward [LOCF])(A) and per-protocol (PP) population (OC [observed case])(B), including both individual and pooled study data.

In both studies complete clearance rates were significantly higher (P<.019 both studies) with imiquimod cream 3.75% compared with placebo at weeks 10 through 16 (EOS). In study 2, complete clearance rates were significantly higher (P<.049) with imiquimod cream 2.5% compared to placebo from week 14 to week 16 (EOS). Complete clearance rates were highest in participants treated with imiquimod cream 3.75% who had EGWs in the perianal region or on the glans penis (28.6% and 33.3%, respectively); however, the number of participants in both groups was relatively small.

Overall, 18.8% of participants took rest periods. Complete clearance rates were higher in men who took a rest period (26.5% and 27.3% for imiquimod cream 3.75% and 2.5%, respectively), perhaps reflecting a more brisk immunological response. The frequency, duration, and number of dosing days prior to the rest period were similar in the active treatment groups and lower in the placebo group.

There was a tendency for older participants 
(ie, >35 years) and those with lower baseline EGW counts (ie, ≤7) to respond better. Participants treated with imiquimod cream 3.75% also tended to respond best to treatment when only 1 anatomic area was affected.

Secondary Efficacy End Points

The proportion of male participants with at least a 75% reduction in EGW count from baseline at EOS was statistically superior with imiquimod 3.75% compared to 
placebo in study 1 and study 2 (P=.001 and P=.008, respectively). Statistical superiority also was apparent with imiquimod cream 2.5% versus placebo in study 2 (P=.013). Overall, 20.2% 
(18.1% study 1 and 22.4% study 2) and 27.3% (30.5% study 1 and 23.9% study 2) of participants achieved 
at least a 75% reduction in wart count at EOS with imiquimod cream 2.5% and 3.75%, respectively (pooled data).

Percentage change in EGW count from baseline at EOS was 35.8% and 24.1% with imiquimod cream 3.75% in study 1 and study 2, respectively, both significantly better than placebo (P=.002 and P=.011, respectively). Change in EGW count following treatment with imiquimod cream 2.5% was only significant in study 2 (P=.001).

Pages

Recommended Reading

Study tracks long-term mortality risk in MRSA bacteremia patients
MDedge Dermatology
Ocular syphilis on the rise: What clinicians must know
MDedge Dermatology
Self-collected penile swabs provide accurate alternative for STI testing
MDedge Dermatology
Progress in treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis
MDedge Dermatology
Peramivir effective against most flu viruses circulating globally
MDedge Dermatology
Staphylococcal Scalded Skin Syndrome in Pregnancy
MDedge Dermatology
Parasitic infection emerging in the Southwestern U.S.
MDedge Dermatology
In men with HIV, GC/CT infections varied by anatomical site
MDedge Dermatology
What Is Your Diagnosis? Fixed Cutaneous Sporotrichosis
MDedge Dermatology
Chromoblastomycosis
MDedge Dermatology

Related Articles