Savvy Psychopharmacology

Catatonia: Recognition, management, and prevention of complications

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Medical complications can be fatal

Catatonia is associated with multiple medical complications that can result in death if unrecognized or unmanaged (Table 21,2,7). Lack of movement increases the risk of thromboembolism, contractures, and pressure ulcers. Additionally, limited food and fluid intake increases the risk of dehydration, electrolyte disturbances, and weight loss. Prophylaxis against these complications include IV fluids, DVT prophylaxis with heparin or low-molecular weight heparin, or initiation of a feeding tube if indicated.

Treatment usually starts with lorazepam

Benzodiazepines are a first-line option for the management of catatonia.2,5 Controversy exists as to effectiveness of different routes of administration. Generally, IV lorazepam is preferred due to its ease of administration, fast onset, and longer duration of action.1 Some inpatient psychiatric units are unable to administer IV benzodiazepines; in these scenarios, IM administration is preferred to oral benzodiazepines.

The initial lorazepam challenge dose should be 2 mg. A positive response to the lorazepam challenge often confirms the catatonia diagnosis.2,7 This challenge should be followed by maintenance doses ranging from 6 to 8 mg/d in divided doses (3 or 4 times a day). Higher doses (up to 24 mg/d) are sometimes used.2,5,8 A recent case report described catatonia remission using lorazepam, 28 mg/d, after unsuccessful ECT.9 The lorazepam dose prior to ECT was 8 mg/d.9 Response is usually seen within 3 to 7 days of an adequate dose.2,8 Parenteral lorazepam typically is continued for several days before converting to oral lorazepam.1 Approximately 70% to 80% of patients with catatonia will show improvement in symptoms with lorazepam.2,7,8

The optimal duration of benzodiazepine treatment is unclear.2 In some cases, once remission of the underlying illness is achieved, benzodiazepines are discontinued.2 However, in other cases, symptoms of catatonia may emerge when lorazepam is tapered, therefore suggesting the need for a longer duration of treatment.2 Despite this high rate of improvement, many patients ultimately receive ECT due to unsustained response or to prevent future episodes of catatonia.

A recent review of 60 Turkish patients with catatonia found 91.7% (n = 55) received oral lorazepam (up to 15 mg/d) as the first-line therapy.7 Improvement was seen in 23.7% (n = 13) of patients treated with lorazepam, yet 70% (n = 42) showed either no response or partial response, and ultimately received ECT in combination with lorazepam.7 The lower improvement rate seen in this review may be secondary to the use of oral lorazepam instead of parenteral, or may highlight the frequency in which patients ultimately go on to receive ECT.

Continue to: ECT

Recommended Reading

Antipsychotics for patients with dementia: The road less traveled
MDedge Psychiatry
Preventing brain damage in psychosis
MDedge Psychiatry
5 Strategies for managing antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia
MDedge Psychiatry
Inflammation in schizophrenia tied to poor functioning
MDedge Psychiatry
Brain mapping takes next step toward precision psychiatry
MDedge Psychiatry
Chinese American man with high risk of psychosis
MDedge Psychiatry
Schizophrenia patients not getting secondary cardiovascular prevention
MDedge Psychiatry
Aripiprazole lauroxil nanocrystal suspension
MDedge Psychiatry
Delusional infestation: not so rare
MDedge Psychiatry
Why is loxapine overlooked, underprescribed for psychosis?
MDedge Psychiatry