Original Research

Feasibility of Risk Stratification of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain Using HEART Score


 

References

Conclusion: The HEART score seems to be a useful tool for risk stratification and a reliable predictor of outcomes in chest pain patients and can therefore be used for triage.

Keywords: chest pain; emergency department; HEART score; acute coronary syndrome; major adverse cardiac events; myocardial infarction; revascularization.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), especially coronary heart disease (CHD), have epidemic proportions worldwide. Globally, in 2012, CVD led to 17.5 million deaths,1,2 with more than 75% of them occurring in developing countries. In contrast to developed countries, where mortality from CHD is rapidly declining, it is increasing in developing countries.1,3 Current estimates from epidemiologic studies from various parts of India indicate the prevalence of CHD in India to be between 7% and 13% in urban populations and 2% and 7% in rural populations.4

Premature mortality in terms of years of life lost because of CVD in India increased by 59% over a 20-year span, from 23.2 million in 1990 to 37 million in 2010.5 Studies conducted in Mumbai (Mumbai Cohort Study) reported very high CVD mortality rates, approaching 500 per 100 000 for men and 250 per 100 000 for women.6,7 However, to the best of our knowledge, in the Indian population, there are minimal data on utilization of a triage score, such as the HEART score, in chest pain patients in the emergency department (ED) in a resource-limited setting.

The most common reason for admitting patients to the ED is chest pain.8 There are various cardiac and noncardiac etiologies of chest pain presentation. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) needs to be ruled out first in every patient presenting with chest pain. However, 80% of patients with ACS have no clear diagnostic features on presentation.9 The timely diagnosis and treatment of patients with ACS improves their prognosis. Therefore, clinicians tend to start each patient on ACS treatment to reduce the risk, which often leads to increased costs due to unnecessary, time-consuming diagnostic procedures that may place burdens on both the health care system and the patient.10

Pages

Recommended Reading

South Asian ancestry associated with twice the risk of heart disease
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
St. Jude to pay $27 million to end DOJ suit over faulty ICDs
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Drinking coffee not linked to increased arrhythmia risk in new study
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Cycling linked to longer life in people with type 2 diabetes
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Rising meth-related heart failure admissions a ‘crisis,’ costly for society
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Dissolving pacemaker impressive in early research
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Diabetes duration linked to increasing heart failure risk
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
In sickness and in health: Spouses can share risk for cardiac events
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Even 10 minutes of daily exercise beneficial after ICD implantation
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Modest calorie reduction plus exercise linked with improved vascular health
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management