Clinical Topics & News

Presentation of a Rare Malignancy: Leiomyosarcoma of the Prostate

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

It has been reported that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy can aid in decreasing tumor burden to facilitate a complete resection.2,8,13,14 Patients who are determined to not be candidates for surgery or whom have widespread disease may be offered systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens vary, but common regimens include anthracyclines (doxorubicin or epirubicin), alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, dacarbazine), and/or vinca alkaloids (vinblastine or vincristine). Patients who do not receive surgical intervention rarely achieve a sustained remission.3,5,8

The long-term prognosis of prostatic leiomyosarcoma is poor due to the aggressive nature of the neoplasm and the high chance of disease recurrence or metastasis. Median survival is estimated at 17 months, and from 50% to 75% of patients die within 2 to 5 years of diagnosis.2,3 Prognosis may be improved in patients with localized disease at diagnosis who are candidates for complete surgical resection with negative margins.13 Adverse prognostic factors include metastatic disease at presentation and the presence of positive surgical margins after surgery.

Overall survival is very poor, and it is estimated that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates are 68%, 34%, and 26%, respectively.3 However, some studies estimate the 5-year survival to be anywhere from 0 to 60%.8,9 Due to the substantially high risk of death, prostatic leiomyosarcoma may be one of the most aggressive and poorly prognostic malignancies involving the prostate.

Conclusion

Prostatic leiomyosarcoma poses a unique diagnostic challenge, as clinical presentation alone may not always be suggestive of underlying malignancy. This challenge is further exacerbated by its aggressive nature, high risk of metastasis, and difficulties with unclear treatment. Proper history and physical examination, differential diagnosis, and a multidisciplinary approach to patient care are the foundation for early detection and promoting improved survival.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Coordination of Care Between Primary Care and Oncology for Patients With Prostate Cancer (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Urothelial Cancer: An Update on New Therapies (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Prostate Cancer Surveillance After Radiation Therapy in a National Delivery System (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Skeletal-Related Events in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Prostate Cancer Who Receive Standard vs Extended-Interval Bisphosphonate Dosing (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Primary Urethral Carcinoma With Nodal Metastasis (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Surviving Colorectal Cancer, Now at Risk for Hypertension
Federal Practitioner
Comparing Artificial Intelligence Platforms for Histopathologic Cancer Diagnosis
Federal Practitioner
New practice guideline: CRC screening isn’t necessary for low-risk patients aged 50-75 years
Federal Practitioner
KRAS-mutation colon, rectal cancers have distinct survival profiles
Federal Practitioner
Sociodemographic disadvantage confers poorer survival in young adults with CRC
Federal Practitioner