Results were as follows:
CR rate of 39%, ORR 52%
Median duration of CR not reached, median duration of objective response 18.4 months
Median PFS 4.9 months, median OS not reached
Toxicity profile demonstrated the following:
Any grade CRS 66%, grade ≥ 2 in 18%
Median time to onset 13.5 hours from cycle 1 day 8, median duration 30.5 hours
Any grade neutropenia in 38%, grade ≥ 3 in 27%
Grade ≥ 2 neurologic event in 15%
Glofitamab received accelerated approval from the FDA on June 15, 2023, with an identical indication to epcoritamab.
The introduction of BsAbs in DLBCL has highlighted some important issues. Will BsAbs supplant CAR T-cell therapy in DLBCL? Experts can be found on both sides of this debate. BsAbs circumvent the logistics surrounding the production of CAR T-cell therapy products and can, for the large part, be administered in the outpatient setting. However, CAR T-cell therapy has significantly longer follow-up times, which speaks to the curative potential of these agents even in the third-line setting. BsAbs, some may argue, seem to carry a more favorable toxicity profile with the CRS mitigation strategies. However, we still have much to learn about the downstream side effects with prolonged T-cell activation and the potential for T-cell exhaustion.
Finally, with the continued development of new agents in this arena, the art of sequencing therapies will become ever more important. What is the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy after BsAb exposure? Can BsAbs be used as bridging therapy to a curative option with CAR T-cell therapy? With longer-term follow-up in several years, will we see late relapses after CR with BsAbs? Ongoing clinical trials investigating combination strategies and CAR T-cell therapy consolidation with BsAbs will hopefully eventually clarify some of these questions.